Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Agonist exposure down-regulates PAF receptor expression in human promonocytic U937 cells, at least partly at the transcriptional level.
Prolonged exposure (8-24 h) of human promonocytic U937 cells to 100 nM 1-O-hexadecyl-2-N-methylcarbamyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (carbarmyl-PAF), a non-metabolizable analogue of platelet-activating factor (PAF), reduced the numbers of PAF receptors by 50-75%, as determined by the radioligand-binding assay. To clarify whether the down-regulation of receptor numbers is due to decreased expression level of the PAF-receptor gene, the effect of carbamyl-PAF on the steady-state level of PAF-receptor mRNA was examined by a highly sensitive reverse-transcriptase PCR method. A 50% decline in the level of PAF-receptor mRNA was observed in U937 cells pretreated with 100 nM carbamyl-PAF for 24 h. The effect of carbamyl-PAF was dose-dependent, with an EC50 value around 10 nM. PAF-receptor antagonist, SRI-63675, was able to attenuate the effect of carbamyl-PAF. Furthermore lysoPAF, at 1 uM, was unable to induce a significant decrease in PAF-receptor mRNA after incubation for 24 h, indicating that the effect of carbamyl-PAF was specific. The half-life of the PAF-receptor mRNA measured in the presence of actinomycin D was unaffected by carbamyl-PAF treatment. In contrast, nuclear run-off experiments demonstrated that the transcription rate of the PAF-receptor gene in carbamyl-PAF-treated cells was about 65% of that in control cells. These results suggest that the PAF receptor in U937 cells is subject to down-regulation by agonist, at least partly, at the transcriptional level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chau et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: