Why the study?
Does Grand Multiparity increase the risk of pregnancy and delivery complications compared to the general obstetrical population?
Does Grand Multiparity increase the risk of pregnancy and delivery complications compared to the general obstetrical population?
Grand multiparity remains a high-risk obstetrical condition associated with significantly increased rates of delivery complications, despite no increase in mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Grand multiparity was associated with higher complication rates; leaves open whether modern care alters management thresholds or outcomes.
The Grand Multipara (GM) has almost disappeared in the Western countries due to the advancement of family planning. Having a heterogeneous population, the problem of Grand Multiparity still exists in our country. This study is based on 5785 cases of GM which were treated in our Obstetrical Department during a period of 16 years (1960-1975). We have compared this group to the general obstetrical population in terms of pregnancy and delivery complications. Face and breech presentations as well as transverse lie were twice, brow presentations were three times as frequent in the GM group. Postpartum hemorrhage (P.P.H.) was four times and premature separation of the placenta twice as frequent. Rupture of the uterus was about 20 times more frequent. Forceps delivery and Cesarean section rate were twice, while the vacuum extraction 5-fold more frequent. Though there was no material mortality and perinatal mortality was not higher than in the general population. Even though the percentage of GM in our population has been decreased in the last 10 years, our results suggest that Grand Multiparity is still a high risk obstetrical problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peretz et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: