Key result
Nineteen freely available genomic AF datasets reveal considerable heterogeneity in conditions, normalization, and analytical settings.
Why the study?
Increasing use of omics approaches has driven reliance on publicly available AF datasets to advance biological discovery, but freely available genomic datasets and their common analytical approaches had not been systematically characterized.
Systematic Review
Only a limited number of genomic datasets for atrial fibrillation are freely available, and their analyses show considerable methodological heterogeneity, indicating a need for more standardized resources.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Only 19 public genomic AF datasets identified amid analytical heterogeneity; extends calls for standardized resources to advance omics discovery.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, characterized by clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Increasing use of genomics and other omics approaches has driven reliance on publicly available AF datasets to advance biological discovery. Thus, this systematic review aimed to identify freely available genomic AF datasets through Mendeley Data and its interconnected repositories, and to characterize the most common analyses performed on these data. The search was conducted in adherence to the PRISMA 2020 guideline. Nineteen freely available genomic AF datasets were identified: Summary statistics for ‘Biobank-driven genomic discovery yields new insight into atrial fibrillation biology’, hum0014.v8.58qt.v1, AF GWAS in UK Biobank, UK Biobank (Publication 9659), GWAS summary statistics from a 2025 multi-ancestry AF meta-analysis, GSE115574, GSE128188, GSE14975, GSE2240, GSE238242, GSE254133, GSE261170, GSE271748, GSE271839, GSE293813, GSE294456, GSE31821, GSE41177, and GSE79768. The GEO datasets were further examined using differential gene expression, functional enrichment, protein–protein interaction networks, hub gene analysis, microRNA target prediction, and gene clustering, as well as, for the more recently deposited datasets, eQTL colocalization, single-cell/single-nucleus clustering, cell–cell communication analysis, and gene-dosage-dependent transcriptional and electrophysiological profiling. These analyses show some consistency but also considerable heterogeneity in initial conditions, data normalization, and analytical methodological settings. In conclusion, only a limited number of datasets are freely available, so additional, well-characterized and standardized datasets are needed to provide a complete picture of the AF pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gjika et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation. Genomic dataset analysis was evaluated on Identification and characterization of freely available genomic AF datasets. Nineteen freely available genomic atrial fibrillation datasets were identified, revealing considerable heterogeneity in initial conditions, data normalization, and analytical settings.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: