Why the study?
Does substitution with albumin alone improve hemodynamic tolerance compared to albumin plus gelatin during plasma exchange?
Does substitution with albumin alone improve hemodynamic tolerance compared to albumin plus gelatin during plasma exchange?
Substitution with albumin alone offers no hemodynamic advantage over a combination of albumin and gelatin during plasma exchange.
Albumin alone shows no hemodynamic advantage over albumin plus gelatin; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Little is known about mechanisms of systemic hypotension frequently reported during plasma exchange (PE). Type of substitution fluids may interfere with hemodynamic tolerance. In a prospective study, right heart catheterization was performed during 18 PE by filtration with isovolumic substitution. Blood volume was measured with 51 Cr tagged erythrocytes and plasma volume (PV) calculated from hematocrit. Substitution fluids were either albumin (A; n = 9) or A + gelatin (A + G; n = 9). In both groups, PE induces significant (p < 0.01) decreases of mean arterial pressure: group A: - 21 ± 14%; group A + G: - 23 ± 15%; of pulmonary wedge pressure: group A: - 41 ± 33%; group A + G: - 36 ± 22%; of cardiac index: group A: - 38 ± 18%; group A + G: - 25 ± 15%. Plasma volume also decreases after PE: group A: - 13.5 ± 4%; group A + G: - 18.5 + 4%. None of the variations are significantly different between the two groups. So we think that substitution with albumin alone has no advantage for hemodynamic tolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guidet et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: