Why the study?
Finding the least harmful surgical access for mitral valve surgery in elderly, frail patients is challenging.
Do less-invasive surgical approaches (mini-thoracotomy or partial upper-sternotomy) improve outcomes compared to full-sternotomy in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Do less-invasive surgical approaches (mini-thoracotomy or partial upper-sternotomy) improve outcomes compared to full-sternotomy in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Less-invasive surgical approaches, particularly mini-thoracotomy, improve perioperative success and reoperation-free survival in elderly patients undergoing mitral valve surgery compared to full sternotomy.
May support mini-thoracotomy in elderly mitral surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background: For mitral valve surgery (MVS) in elderly, frail patients with increasing life expectancy, finding the least harmful means of access is a challenge. In the complexity of MVS approach evolution, using three different approaches (mini-thoracotomy (MT), partial upper-sternotomy (PS), full-sternotomy (FS), we developed a personalized, minimized-invasiveness algorithm for MVS. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 517 elderly patients (≥70 years) were identified who had undergone MVS ± TV repair. MVS was performed via MT (n = 274), FS (n = 128) and PS (n = 115). The appropriate access type was defined according to several clinical patient conditions. Using uni- and multivariate regression models, we analyzed combined operative success (residual MV regurgitation, conversion to MV replacement or larger thoracic incisions); perioperative success (30-days mortality, thoracotomy, ECMO, pacemaker implantation, dialysis, longer ventilation); and reoperation-free long-term survival. An additional EuroSCORE2 adjustment was performed to reduce the bias of clinical conditions between all access types. Results: The EuroSCORE2-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed significantly increased reoperation-free survival in the MT cohort compared to FS (HR 0.640; 95% CI 0.442–0.926; p = 0.018). Mortality was additionally reduced after the implementation of PS (p = 0.023). Combined operative success was comparable between the three access types. The perioperative success was higher in the MT cohort compared to FS (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.32–3.63; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Less-invasive approaches in elderly patients improve perioperative success and reoperation-free survival in those undergoing MVS procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oezpeker et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: