Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Some factors affecting a long cesium beam standard's accuracy are discussed and the results of two year's operation are given. Increasing the interaction length reduces the linewidth and thus the errors in measuring the line center, as long as the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficient. Errors due to nonlinearity of FM used in servo locking a crystal oscillator to the resonance are below 1×10-11; other servo errors are smaller. The described variable C-field measuring technique and demagnetizable Armco iron shields reduce errors due to C-field uncertainty to 1.2×10-12. Cavity phase shift effects are below 1.5×10-11. Standard deviation of single measurements with 4.6 sec averaging time is 2.7×10-11under good conditions. Considering all effects, including those of microwave power and of cavity tuning, the stated figure of accuracy is ±3×10-11. Two year's VLF comparisons show agreement to about ±10-10with respect to USFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Kartaschoff (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: