Fat grafting: Fact or fiction?

To the Editor: Fat grafting is an accepted and frequently used procedure, particularly with the current interest in volume restoration surgery. The varying results achieved by this procedure, which are often explained as “technique-dependent,” likewise seem to be widely accepted. The reports on different techniques for harvesting, treating, and injecting fat cells that appear in the literature are often contradictory. One author may advocate the use of small cannulas to harvest the fat in order to reduce trauma, while another may argue just the opposite. Similar differences exist with respect to both treatment of the fat before grafting (eg, to centrifuge or not to centrifuge) and techniques for fat injection. There is even controversy concerning fat longevity before or after being stored. It was perplexing to me how we can continue to perform a procedure that involves so many contradictory approaches and so little scientific evidence of success. It was even more perplexing to see the very good long-term results demonstrated at various professional meetings; I've often asked myself, “Why can't I get these results for my patients?” It was not until I viewed a videotape on the procedure by one of its more fervid proponents that I was able to resolve this dilemma. I realized that the secret to success has nothing to do with the fat grafted, and everything to do with the technique.