Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genetic polymorphisms and variable expression of drug receptors, metabolizing enzymes, and transporters have been linked to interindividual differences in efficacy and toxicity of many Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic agents. In multiple sclerosis, the combination of heterogeneity of disease pathology and significant variation in clinical response to disease-modifying agents necessitates the definition of biomarkers that can a priori predict therapeutic response and define appropriate therapeutic regimens. Pharmacogenomic studies will directly address the question of heterogeneity by analysis of the correlation between different genomic variants and clinical responses to therapy. These studies will include longitudinal designs, maximize clinical response variables, include whole-genome technologies, use large patient cohorts, and require the development of novel mathematical algorithms designed to integrate the wealth of disparate data to identify modest genetic effects and interactions. ABC = adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette; EAE = experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; GA = glatiramer acetate; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; MBP = myelin basic protein; MS = multiple sclerosis; MTX = mitoxantrone; MxA = antiviral-related gene MX1; NAb = neutralizing antibody; PGt = pharmacogenetic; PGx = pharmacogenomics; PML = progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; RRMS = relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; STR = single-tandem repeat; TCR = T-cell receptor; TGF = transforming growth factor; VCAM1 = vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VLA4 = very late antigen 4; WGA = whole-genome association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pappas et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: