Why the study?
Does proximal femoral nail improve operative time and recovery in patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur compared to extramedullary devices?
Does proximal femoral nail improve operative time and recovery in patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur compared to extramedullary devices?
Proximal femoral nail is a minimally invasive implant that affords faster operative time, early return to physical activity, and lesser blood loss compared to extramedullary devices for subtrochanteric femur fractures.
PFN may reduce operative time and blood loss versus extramedullary devices; leaves open optimal fixation strategy for subtrochanteric fractures.
Introduction: Hip is one of the important joint for locomotion in human beings. So fractures in and around hip joint are of great concern to treating surgeon and patient. We have made an attempt to evaluate these complex fractures and compared the efficacy of proximal femoral nail and extamedullary devices in treatment of subtrochanteric fracture femur. Materials and Methods: After informed consent was given, all 56 consecutive patients with subtrochanteric fracture of femur were randomized into two treatment groups. One group of patients were treated with dynamic hip screw or Dynamic condylar screw (Group I) and other group received proximal femoral nail (Group II). All procedures were performed by staff surgeons with patient supine on a fracture table. Result: The mean operative time in Group I (93.57 min) was significantly higher than in Group II (80 min) with a P value of < 0> Conclusion: We conclude that subtrochanteric fractures are difficult to understand and manage. We consider that the PFN is a good minimally invasive implant for unstable proximal femoral fractures when closed reduction is possible. In general, PFN afforded early return to physical activity, faster rehabilitation & walking ability, lesser blood loss and comparable success rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deshpande et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: