Why the study?
Does intrinsic cardiac nerve stimulation modify cardiac performance in resting chronic, conscious dogs?
Does intrinsic cardiac nerve stimulation modify cardiac performance in resting chronic, conscious dogs?
The intrinsic cardiac nervous system has limited effects on ventricular performance in resting conscious dogs under minimal sympathetic drive, but significantly affects atrial contractility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Limits ventricular effects of intrinsic nerves at rest in conscious models; leaves open roles during sympathetic drive or disease.
The present experiments were performed to examine the capability of the intrinsic cardiac nerves (ICN) to modify cardiac performance in the resting chronic, conscious dog. Control and cardiac-denervated dogs were instrumented for recording of left atrial (LA) and ventricular (LV) contractility, heart rate, and atrioventricular (AV) conduction time. Acetylcholine (ACh) and nicotine (Nic) were administered via an indwelling coronary artery catheter. Limited distribution from the injection site only allowed access to the LA, LV, and AV node. Both beta-blockade with timolol and cardiac denervation were used to separate direct effects of ICN stimulation from indirect (e.g., reflex) effects. ACh produced the expected negative inotropic and dromotropic changes. ICN stimulation with Nic caused large decreases in LA on but only trivial effects on the LV. We concluded that the ICN has limited effects on cardiac performance in the resting animal under minimal sympathetic drive. It is likely, however, that the ICN is capable of significantly depressing cardiac function under conditions of elevated sympathetic tone as would be encountered in exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priola et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: