The majority of UK prehospital services comply with safety guidelines for prehospital anaesthesia, though gaps remain in the use of trained assistants and mandatory continual training.
UK prehospital anaesthesia services show variable compliance with safety recommendations; leaves open whether addressing gaps in assistants and training improves outcomes.
AIM: To establish the national picture of prehospital anaesthesia in the UK and to reference practice against the Association of prior to Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland safety guideline on prehospital anaesthesia. METHODS: Lead clinicians were identified for all prehospital services in the UK that could potentially be performing prehospital anaesthesia and invited to complete a detailed online survey. The survey requested details on team structure, the process for prehospital anaesthesia, drugs and equipment used and training and governance arrangements. RESULTS: 55 responses were received from 63 invitations sent (87.3%) yielding usable data for 47 services. 31 of the 47 services (70%) responded that they performed prehospital anaesthesia. All services performing prehospital anaesthesia utilised a doctor but only 18 services (58%) always utilised a trained assistant. 28 services (90%) maintained a database and over half of services (55%) performed less than 20 prehospital anaesthetics annually. 23 services (74%) had a designated lead clinician for prehospital anaesthesia and 25 (81%) had a written difficult airway plan. 19 services (61%) had mandatory continual training requirements. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of services are currently complying with the recommendations in the Association of prior to Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland safety guideline. There are still areas of concern, particularly with regard to ongoing training and the high numbers of services that do not use a trained assistant for the process of prehospital anaesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cowan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: