Why the study?
Quantifying RV function is important in pulmonary hypertension, but current phenotyping strategies rely on few invasive hemodynamic parameters to quantify RV dysfunction severity.
Can unsupervised clustering of advanced hemodynamic features identify novel right ventricular function subphenotypes in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Can unsupervised clustering of advanced hemodynamic features identify novel right ventricular function subphenotypes in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Advanced hemodynamic clustering identifies five distinct right ventricular subphenotypes in pulmonary hypertension, offering a potential precision-medicine approach beyond traditional PVR assessment.
Novel RV phenotypes in PH via clustering may refine phenotyping; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Quantifying right ventricular (RV) function is important to describe the pathophysiology of in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Current phenotyping strategies in PH rely on few invasive hemodynamic parameters to quantify RV dysfunction severity. The aim of this study was to identify novel RV phenotypes using unsupervised clustering methods on advanced hemodynamic features of RV function. Methods Participants were identified from the University of Arizona Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (n=190). RV-pulmonary artery coupling (Ees/Ea), RV systolic (Ees) and diastolic function (Eed) was quantified from stored RV pressure waveforms. Consensus clustering analysis with bootstrapping was used to identify the optimal clustering method. Pearson correlation analysis was used to reduce collinearity between variables. RV cluster subphenotypes were characterized using clinical data and compared to pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) quintiles. Results Five distinct RV clusters (C1-C5) with distinct RV subphenotypes were identified using k-medoids with a Pearson distance matrix. Clusters 1 and 2 both have low diastolic stiffness (Eed) and afterload (Ea) but RV-PA coupling (Ees/Ea) is decreased in C2. Intermediate cluster (C3) has a similar Ees/Ea as C2 but with higher PA pressure and afterload. Clusters C4 and C5 have increased Eed and Ea but C5 has a significant decrease in Ees/Ea. Cardiac output was high in C3 distinct from the other clusters. In the PVR quintiles, contractility increased and stroke volume decreased as a function of increased afterload. World Symposium PH classifications were distributed across clusters and PVR quintiles. Conclusions RV-centric phenotyping offers an opportunity for a more precise-medicine based management approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janowski et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: