Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of bridge length and rigidity on the formation of C,C‘-linked carborane anions were studied. Reaction of 1,2-(CH 2 ) 3 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 ( 1 ), 1,2-(CH 2 CH CHCH 2 )-1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 ( 2 ), or 1,2-(CH 2 ) 4 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 ( 3 ) with excess Li metal in THF gave “carbon-atoms-adjacent” (CAd) arachno -carborane salt [{1,2-(CH 2 ) 3 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 }{Li 4 (THF) 5 }] 2 ( 6 ), [{1,2-(CH 2 CH CHCH 2 )-1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 }{Li 4 (THF) 5 }] 2 ( 7 ), or [{1,2-(CH 2 ) 4 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 }{Li 4 (THF) 5 }] 2 ( 8 ), respectively. On the other hand, reduction of 1,2-(CH 2 ) 5 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 ( 4 ) or 1,2-(CH 2 ) 6 -1,2-C 2 B 10 H 10 ( 5 ) with excess Li metal followed by cation exchange of NaI, or directly with excess Na metal, afforded “carbon-atoms-apart” (CAp) nido -carborane salt [{1,3-(CH 2 ) 5 -1,3-C 2 B 10 H 10 }{Na 2 (THF) 4 }] n ( 9 ) or [{1,4-(CH 2 ) 6 -1,4-C 2 B 10 H 10 }{Na 2 (THF) 4 }] n ( 10 ). All complexes were fully characterized by various spectroscopic techniques and elemental analyses as well as single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The results showed that although both the bridge length and rigidity of C,C‘-linked o -carboranes have significant effects on the formation of carborane anions, the former plays a more important role than the latter in controlling the relative positions of the two cage carbon atoms during the reductive process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: