Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The answers to the question posed in the title are different for the two compounds: In the case of 1 the X-ray crystal structure observed at 100 K is that corresponding to the transition state of the free molecule between the two possible valence tautomers. In contrast, the crystal of 2 contains molecules with rectangular arrangement of the four-membered ring in two orientations rotated through 90°. The transition state of 1 in the crystal is the energetically more favored state since it enables a better packing of the tert-butyl groups. These investigations disprove afresh the nearly square arrangement considered as plausible for the four-membered ring atoms of 2 on steric grounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dunitz et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: