Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although in substantial agreement with Tippins and Wittmann's analysis, their call for a moratorium on the practice of custody evaluators making recommendations to the court does not solve the many problems that they have raised, and may have unintended consequences which place families at even greater risk. This commentary reflects our agreement with some of the authors’ major points of contention, focuses on several points of disagreement, and suggests alternative remedies for the shortcomings and ethical problems described in child custody evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: