Why the study?
Does intramedullary femoral lengthening without prior stabilisation improve outcomes in patients with leg length discrepancy and an unstable hip without proximal migration on weight bearing?
Does intramedullary femoral lengthening without prior stabilisation improve outcomes in patients with leg length discrepancy and an unstable hip without proximal migration on weight bearing?
This case series evaluates intramedullary femoral lengthening without prior stabilization in a specific subgroup of patients with leg length discrepancy and unstable hips.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice in leg length discrepancy with unstable hips; hypothesis-generating for intramedullary lengthening without prior stabilization.
Background: Leg length discrepancy due to proximal migration of the femur commonly presents with a short leg gait and symptoms of hip and low back pain. The most common causes are chronic hip dislocation due to developmental dysplasia or the late sequelae of neonatal hip sepsis. It is usually recommended that the hip is stabilised prior to performing limb lengthening, and various techniques have been described. Unfortunately, these methods are not without complications, such as anatomical distortion making future arthroplasty more complex. We recognised a subgroup of these patients in whom the hip appeared unstable on plain film radiography, but in whom there was no proximal migration on weight bearing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laubscher et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: