The performance of zero-IF receivers with current-driven passive mixers driven by 25% duty-cycle quadrature clocks is studied and analyzed. It is shown that, in general, these receivers outperform the ones that utilize passive mixers with 50% duty-cycle clocks. The known problems in receivers with 50% duty-cycle mixers, such as having unequal high- and low-side conversion gains, unexpected IIP2 and IIP3 numbers, and IQ crosstalk, are significantly lowered due to the operating principles of the 25% duty-cycle passive mixer. It is revealed that with an intelligent sizing of the design parameters, the 25%-duty-cycle-mixer-based receiver is superior in terms of linearity, noise, and elimination of IQ crosstalk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirzaei et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: