Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attempts to describe the geometry about three-coordinate silver(i) complexes have proven difficult because interatomic angles generally vary wildly and there is no adequate or readily available classification system found in the literature. A search of the Cambridge Structural Database shows that complexes formed between any metal centre and three non-metal donors (18 001 examples) usually adopt geometries that are quite different than ideal 'textbook' extremes of either trigonal planar (~4% with α = β = γ = 120 ± 2°), T-shaped (~0.05% with α = 180 ± 2°, β = γ = 90 ± 2°), or trigonal pyramidal (~0.3% with α = β = γ = 110 ± 2°). Moreover, there are multiple variations of "Y-type" and "other" shapes that require elaboration. Thus, to assist in future structural descriptions, we developed a classification system that spans all known and yet-to-be-discovered three-coordinate geometries. A spreadsheet has also been constructed that utilizes the "shape-space" approach to extract the structural description from a user input of three angles about a tri-coordinate centre and the number of atoms in a plane. The structures of two silver(i) complexes of new N-donor ligands p-NH2C6H4C6H4CH(pz = pyrazol-1-yl)2, L1, and 2-ferrocenyl-4,5-di(2-pyridyl)imidazole, L2, illustrate the utility of this classification system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: