Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite many studies on binding patterns of commercial lectins and other glycan binding proteins, unexpected recognition motifs are still revealed, highlighting the necessity to (re-)investigate these specificities deeply, as they are used for rapid screening of glycosylation patterns or diagnostic histochemistry. The current work is an extension of previous defined glycan microarrays, displaying a library of natural anionic structures not only including N -acetylneuraminic acid but also N -glycolylneuraminic acid as well as sulphated galactose, N -acetylglucosamine or glucuronic acid based on using recombinant glycosyl- and sulpho-transferases. Moreover, anionic modifications on linear tetrasaccharides versus on typical biantennary N-glycan core structures were compared regarding binding pattern and intensities. As in our previous studies, 2-amino- N -(2-amino-ethyl)-benzamide (AEAB)-labelled glycans were probed with various plant lectins, C-type lectins, sialic-acid specific lectins, different antibodies, e.g. anti-NeuGc and recombinant prokaryotic lectins (RPLs). Indeed, expected binding patterns were observed; however, some proteins revealed more narrow specificities. The L2 anti-HNK-1 elicits its specificity for GlcAβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc without the necessity of sulphation also for linear glycans. For anti-Le X (clone L5) it is known that sialic acid masking of the epitope is not tolerated, while here we demonstrate that anti-Le A antibody (clone T174) can interact with α2,3 Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc capped epitopes. HECA-452 recognizes sialyl Le X and sialyl Le A , but only with Neu5Ac attached. This anionic glycan array contains most common anionic glycan modifications, can be flexibly modified and reveals commonly-overlooked specificities providing insights into sialic acid-specific interactions including the often neglected N -glycolylneuraminic acid, thereby applying these findings also to murine or other deuterostome models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuschy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: