Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jun 1949Vasomotor Response to the Intravenous Administration of Neoiopax for Urograms R.V. Daut, and J. Hartwell Dunn R.V. DautR.V. Daut More articles by this author , and J. Hartwell DunnJ. Hartwell Dunn More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69188-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1949 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPearlman C and Newland J (2018) Severe Reaction Due to Intravenous Neo-Iopax: Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 1, (407-411), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1952.Getzoff P (2018) Use of Antihistamine Drug Prophylaxis Against Diodrast ReactionsJournal of Urology, VOL. 65, NO. 6, (1139-1142), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1951.Richardson J and Rose D (2018) Clinical Evaluation of Urokon in PyelographyJournal of Urology, VOL. 63, NO. 6, (1113-1119), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1950. Volume 61Issue 6June 1949Page: 1094-1098 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1949 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information R.V. Daut More articles by this author J. Hartwell Dunn More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daut et al. (1949) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: