Why the study?
Is a higher frailty index based on routine laboratory tests associated with an increased risk of QTc prolongation in older adults?
Is a higher frailty index based on routine laboratory tests associated with an increased risk of QTc prolongation in older adults?
A frailty index based on routine laboratory data can effectively identify older adults at increased risk for QTc prolongation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FI-Lab identifies older adults at higher QTc prolongation risk; supports frailty-based stratification but leaves causal effects and practice change open.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) proglongation should be explored to stratify high-risk individuals to aid the prevention of incident cardiovascular events and mortality. The diversity of risk factors for QTc prolongation suggests that use of the frailty index (FI), indicating general health deficits, may be an effective approach, especially in the elderly, to identify the risk of QTc prolongation. METHODS: We used the data of 1,780 individuals aged 70-87 years from the Rugao Longevity and Ageing Study (RuLAS), a community-based longitudinal study. The FI was constructed using 20 routine laboratory tests, plus the body mass index and measures of systolic and diastolic blood pressures (FI-Lab). RESULTS: The mean FI-Lab value was 0.24±0.09. The mean heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) was 407±38 ms. The prevalence of QTc prolongation was 5.2% in elderly community populations aged 70-87 years. A higher FI-Lab value was associated with a higher risk for QTc prolongation. Each 10% increase in the FI-Lab value increased the odds ratio (OR) by 33% (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.07-1.64). Compared with the lowest quartile, the top quartile FI-Lab score was associated with a 2.50-fold QTc prolongation risk in elderly individuals (95% CI: 1.21-5.19). CONCLUSION: An FI based on routine laboratory data can identify older adults at increased risk for QTc prolongation. The FI approach may therefore be useful for the risk stratification of QTc prolongation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: