Why the study?
Does the proposed algorithm accurately detect motion artifacts in PPG signals in healthy and cardiovascular diseased volunteers?
Does the proposed algorithm accurately detect motion artifacts in PPG signals in healthy and cardiovascular diseased volunteers?
The proposed algorithm demonstrates high accuracy in detecting motion artifacts in PPG signals across both healthy individuals and those with cardiovascular disease.
Promising for PPG monitoring tools; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The presence of motion artifacts in photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals is one of the major obstacles in the extraction of reliable cardiovascular parameters in continuous monitoring applications. In the current paper we present an algorithm for motion artifact detection based on the analysis of the variations in the time and the period domain characteristics of the PPG signal. The extracted features are ranked using a normalized mutual information feature selection algorithm and the best features are used in a support vector machine classification model to distinguish between clean and corrupted sections of the PPG signal. The proposed method has been tested in healthy and cardiovascular diseased volunteers, considering 11 different motion artifact sources. The results achieved by the current algorithm (sensitivity--SE: 84.3%, specificity--SP: 91.5% and accuracy--ACC: 88.5%) show that the current methodology is able to identify both corrupted and clean PPG sections with high accuracy in both healthy (ACC: 87.5%) and cardiovascular diseases (ACC: 89.5%) context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Couceiro et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: