Burst stimulation of parasympathetic innervation potentiates salivary and vascular responses in the submandibular gland of ferrets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support clinical use; leaves open burst parasympathetic stimulation for salivary hypofunction.
Submandibular salivary and vascular responses to different patterns of stimulation of the parasympathetic innervation have been investigated in anaesthetized ferrets in the presence and absence of atropine. 2. At low stimulus frequencies likely to fall within the physiological range (0.5-2.0 Hz continuously; 5.0-20.0 Hz in 1 s bursts at 10 s intervals) secretion of fluid and protein were both potentiated by the bursting pattern of stimulation and the latency of the secretory response was reduced. Over a somewhat lower range (0.5-1.0 Hz continuously; 5.0-10.0 Hz in bursts) the submandibular vascular response was also significantly potentiated by employing this intermittent pattern of stimulation. Above these frequency ranges no such potentiation occurred. 3. Pre-treatment with atropine (2.0 mg kg-1) blocked the submandibular secretory responses to stimulation of the chorda-lingual nerve at these low frequencies and the residual responses at higher frequencies were not significantly affected by changing the pattern of stimulation. The vascular response was somewhat reduced after atropine but that which persisted was enhanced by stimulating in bursts. 4. It is concluded that the release of some transmitter from postganglionic terminals in the submandibular gland of the ferret must be potentiated by the arrival of action potentials at short intervals and possible mechanisms are considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tobin et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: