Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The concept of irreversible investment is applied to highly contagious animal disease control when uncertainty about the spread of the disease is resolved over time. In comparison with the strategy of destroying infected herds, the vaccination programme causes additional losses that cannot be recovered. These sunk costs are thus irreversible. Therefore, the gain from waiting for new information, namely the quasi-option value, should induce animal health authorities to delay the decision to vaccinate if the probability of a widespread epidemic is not too high. A numerical example is developed for foot and mouth disease (FMD) in Brittany.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivier Mahul (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: