Geospatial assessment reveals escalating flood and drought vulnerabilities across Indian districts between 2001 and 2011, highlighting intensifying compound risks in northern and eastern regions.
Floods and droughts are intensifying and increasingly co-occurring under hydroclimatic variability, yet vulnerability assessments typically consider these extremes in isolation, masking compounded risks. Here, we develop a unified framework to quantify district-scale vulnerability to floods, droughts, and their combined impacts across India. Central to the framework is the Multi-Hazard Vulnerability Index (MHVI), supported by a bivariate vulnerability classification that explicitly captures overlapping susceptibilities to opposing hydrological extremes. Applying the framework for 2001 and 2011 reveals a substantial escalation of vulnerability, with highly flood-vulnerable districts increasing from 16.5% to 21.4% and drought-vulnerable districts from 10.6% to 18.1%, alongside a growing concentration of multi-hazard hotspots in eastern and northern India. The results demonstrate pronounced spatial and temporal shifts in compound vulnerability, highlighting regions where development gains are increasingly exposed to multi-hazard risks. The scalable framework offers a robust basis for risk-informed adaptation planning, resource prioritization, and climate-resilient disaster risk reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: