Retrospective cohort study reveals sex-specific predictors of substance use treatment non-completion in Veterans, highlighting the need for tailored community interventions.
Treatment completion is a key indicator of success in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs, associated with reduced relapse and improved long-term recovery outcomes. While several factors influencing treatment completion have been identified, whether these predictors differ by sex specifically among Veterans in community-based programs remains unknown. To identify predictors of treatment non-completion, we analyzed 2018-2022 Treatment Episode Dataset - Discharges (TEDS-D) data for 168,092 U.S. Veterans discharged from publicly funded community-based SUD treatment programs. Eleven predictors were examined using sex-stratified binary logistic regression models. Predictors included sociodemographic factors (i.e. age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, housing status, recent arrests, treatment setting), and treatment-related variables (i.e. co-occurring psychiatric disorders, polysubstance use, prior SUD treatment history, substance use at treatment discharge). All predictors were significantly associated with treatment non-completion; however, only six predictors (i.e. race/ethnicity, employment status, housing status, treatment setting, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, prior SUD treatment history) exhibited sex-dependent patterns. Among females, psychiatric comorbidities, unemployment, unstable housing, and prior SUD treatment showed stronger associations with higher odds of non-completion. Among males, outpatient care was associated with higher odds of treatment non-completion, while Hispanic/Latino males and males of other non-Hispanic race and ethnicity had lower odds of non-completion relative to White non-Hispanic males. Recognizing sex differences in risk factors for SUD treatment non-completion among Veterans receiving community-based care may inform more responsive interventions. Integrating these considerations into treatment approaches may improve retention and support sustained recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chavez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: