What does this research mean for the field?

IOC presidential closing verdicts from 1984 to 2026 functioned not as objective retrospective evaluations of performance, but as immediate, selective institutional interpretations used to define the success of each Olympic edition at the moment of closure. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine how International Olympic Committee (IOC) presidential closing verdicts evolved from 1984 to 2026 to define the success of completed Olympic Games.

August 28, 2026The International Journal of the History of Sport

Pronouncing the Games a Success: IOC Presidential Closing Verdicts from Samaranch to Coventry, 1984–2026

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To examine how International Olympic Committee (IOC) presidential closing verdicts evolved from 1984 to 2026 to define the success of completed Olympic Games.
Analyzed presidential closing addresses, official Olympic reports, issues of the Olympic Review, contemporary news media coverage, and IOC governance records spanning 1984 to 2026.
Tracked rhetorical and evaluative transitions across successive presidential tenures, including Juan Antonio Samaranch, Jacques Rogge, Thomas Bach, and Kirsty Coventry.
Samaranch established explicit comparative rankings between editions during the 1980s, culminating in peak comparative endorsements at Barcelona 1992 and Sydney 2000.
Rogge abandoned cross-edition ranking in favor of non-comparative affirmative descriptors, whereas Bach tethered closing statements to institutional reforms, humanitarian claims, tolerance, and diplomatic bridge-building.
Closing verdicts functioned not as retrospective performance audits, but as immediate, selective institutional interpretations designed to establish the terms of an edition's success at the moment of closure.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Historical discourse analysis reveals shifting rhetoric in Olympic closing addresses from 1984 to 2026, indicating verdicts function as institutional framing rather than objective assessments.

Cite This Study

Ling et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9145ead15324a1df3a931c https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2026.2721406

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Historical discourse analysis reveals shifting rhetoric in Olympic closing addresses from 1984 to 2026, indicating verdicts function as institutional framing rather than objective assessments.

Pronouncing the Games a Success: IOC Presidential Closing Verdicts from Samaranch to Coventry, 1984–2026

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Pronouncing the Games a Success: IOC Presidential Closing Verdicts from Samaranch to Coventry, 1984–2026

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider