Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental survey shows that source citations improve disinformation detection only with high digital literacy in South Koreans, indicating transparency alone cannot curb online falsehoods.
This study investigates whether source citations enhance detection of false information and whether their effects depend on digital literacy and information processing style. In an experimental survey of 1,013 South Koreans, citations show no overall effect. However, they significantly improve detection of disinformation—but not misinformation—among individuals with higher digital literacy. Intuitive processing lowers detection ability, and citations do not counteract this tendency. The findings challenge assumptions that transparency universally improves evaluation, showing that citation effectiveness depends on user capabilities and the type of falsehood, and highlighting the need to strengthen digital literacy alongside transparency initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: