Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility study demonstrates high accuracy for lightweight hypertensive retinopathy grading in retinal scans, indicating the viability of point-of-care edge screening.
Background: Hypertensive retinopathy (HR) is an early marker of hypertension-related end-organ damage, and multi-grade classification is limited by overlap between the early stages. No prior study has reported edge-deployable HR grading from optical coherence tomography (OCT). We assess patient-level–validated four-grade HR classification from en-face OCT with on-device inference. Methods: MobileViT-XXS and EfficientNetV2-B0 were evaluated on 478 en-face OCT images from 221 patients. To avoid leakage, all partitions were patient-level: stratified group 5-fold cross-validation with a patient-disjoint test set. Each model was evaluated as a 5-fold soft-voting ensemble, with inference profiled on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano. Accuracy, weighted F1, quadratic-weighted kappa, and ROC–AUC were reported; the models were compared by McNemar’s test, and clinical utility by referable-HR (Grade ≥ 2) triage. Results: MobileViT-XXS achieved 84.4% accuracy, ROC–AUC 0.944, and quadratic-weighted kappa 0.916, significantly outperforming EfficientNetV2-B0 (McNemar p = 0.013). Mild-grade overlap limited four-class accuracy, but referable-HR triage reached 95.6% accuracy, 95.2% sensitivity, and 95.8% negative predictive value. MobileViT-XXS required only 3.83 MB versus 23.70 MB, and on-device TensorRT FP16 five-fold ensemble inference achieved 10.4 ms (96 FPS) at 8.9 W. Conclusions: Lightweight models enable feasible, power-efficient point-of-care HR triage from en-face OCT; broader multi-center validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şüyun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: