Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals effective multilingual text embedding training from scratch across Arabic, English, and Urdu, suggesting batch size and task domain outweigh raw parameter scale.
We investigate how much useful multilingual embedding capability can be obtained when the student encoder starts from random initialization, under a strict single-GPU compute budget. We present the mentee-embed series — three controlled experiments (v1–v3) using a 41M-parameter Transformer encoder with a custom 50,000-entry BPE tokenizer, trained entirely from scratch on Arabic, English, and Urdu. The student is randomly initialized; a frozen pretrained teacher (multilingual-e5-base) supplies relational distillation signal only during Stage B but transfers no weights in to the student. Our three-version controlled progression isolates the dominant training factors: batch size and retrieval training data domain matter more than model size in this regime. The v1→v2→v3 ablation demonstrates this strikingly: scaling from 41M to 125M parameters while reducing batch size (v2) degrades Protocol A avg MRR@10 from 0.585 to 0.429, while returning to 41M with batch size 512 and adding MS-MARCO retrieval data (v3) recovers to 0.655 — a 3× Protocol C MS-MARCO improvement (0.215→0.645) and STS-B Spearman ρ = 0.683. Model weights: https://huggingface.co/MenteEAI/mentee-embed-v3 Code: https://github.com/MenteE-s/mentee-embeddings
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: