Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 28, 2026Sport Sciences for HealthOpen Access

Indicators of strength, oxidative stress, and muscle damage in Paralympic powerlifting athletes undergoing variable resistance training

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EVEdson Lucas Monteiro VieiraFAFelipe J. AidarGBGeorgian Bădicu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative trial reveals variable resistance induces greater acute fatigue but enhances torque development in Paralympic powerlifters, indicating distinct neuromuscular recovery profiles.

Key Points

  • To compare the acute effects of variable resistance training using chains versus traditional invariable resistance on peak torque, rate of torque development, oxidative stress biomarkers, and muscle damage in Paralympic powerlifting athletes.
  • Fourteen Paralympic powerlifters (N=14; age 28.00 ± 5.64 years; 1RM 141.43 ± 47.43 kg) participated in a 3-week study involving 1RM bench press familiarization followed by training sessions of 5 sets of 5 repetitions at 80% 1RM.
  • Outcomes including peak torque (PT), rate of torque development (RTD), oxidative stress markers (sulfhydryl), and muscle damage markers (lactate dehydrogenase) were measured pre-training, immediately post-training, and at 24 h and 48 h post-training.
  • Peak torque was significantly lower with chains than traditional resistance immediately post-exercise (368.48 ± 119.47 vs. 440.98 ± 116.38, p=0.022), at 24 h (420.36 ± 114.84 vs. 500.99 ± 103.67, p=0.004), and at 48 h (444.96 ± 111.25 vs. 502.90 ± 122.89, p<0.001, η2p=0.561).
  • Rate of torque development was significantly higher with chains than traditional training at 24 h (12,101.89 ± 5070.36 vs. 7915.32 ± 4486.39, p=0.002) and at 48 h (12,133.42 ± 6399.98 vs. 8187.01 ± 4903.53, p=0.016, η2p=0.452).
  • Traditional training significantly elevated sulfhydryl production from pre- to post-exercise and up to 48 h, whereas lactate dehydrogenase differed significantly between chain and traditional training only at the 24 h mark.

Cite This Study

Vieira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a914631d15324a1df3a9936https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-026-01909-0
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share