Diagnostic validation study demonstrates high accuracy for speech-based obstructive sleep apnea screening in a clinical cohort, highlighting potential low-burden triage tools.
This study investigates non-invasive detection of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from daytime speech in a limited polysomnography-labeled clinical cohort. The objective was to evaluate whether speaker-verification-inspired representations can support robust speech-based OSA screening under constrained clinical data conditions. We compared conventional mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC)-based classifiers with i-vector systems using cosine-similarity, support vector machine (SVM), and neural-network (NN) back ends, and included an exploratory ECAPA-TDNN embedding experiment using a pretrained frozen speaker model with prototype-based cosine scoring. Speech recordings from 93 participants were collected under controlled conditions and evaluated using subject-independent validation. Supervised i-vector back ends achieved the strongest performance. The i-vector SVM system obtained the highest numerical accuracy of 96.3% and the strongest threshold-independent performance, with AUC-ROC of 0.987 and AUC-PR of 0.992, while the i-vector NN system showed closely comparable performance with a non-significant AUC-ROC difference from i-vector SVM. ECAPA-TDNN showed moderate class separability but did not outperform the i-vector systems. Demographic-only and speech-demographic fusion analyses indicated that sex, age, and body mass index carried predictive information but did not fully explain the best speech-based performance. These findings support speech-based OSA screening as a low-burden complementary approach, while emphasizing the need for larger, balanced, and externally validated cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Škapová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: