Key result
Worse baseline myocardial strain is consistently linked to higher MACE risk.
Why the study?
While LVEF remains central to risk stratification in NICM, it may not fully capture myocardial impairment, and the prognostic role of strain imaging remains incompletely defined.
Does myocardial strain imaging provide independent prognostic value beyond LVEF in adult patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=7,903)
Does myocardial strain imaging provide independent prognostic value beyond LVEF in adult patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Myocardial strain imaging, particularly LVGLS, provides incremental prognostic value beyond LVEF for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Strain imaging's role in NICM risk stratification remains undefined; leaves open its incremental value beyond LVEF pending prospective validation.
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) carries significant morbidity and mortality. While left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains central to risk stratification, it may not fully capture the extent of myocardial impairment, and strain imaging can provide independent prognostic information beyond LVEF alone. Myocardial strain imaging may provide additional prognostic value, but its role in NICM remains incompletely defined. This scoping review, conducted per PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception through October 25, 2025, to identify studies evaluating myocardial strain parameters, specifically left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), left ventricular global circumferential strain, left ventricular global radial strain, and right ventricular global longitudinal strain, in adult NICM populations using speckle-tracking echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and synthesized descriptively. From 1356 records, 36 studies (7903 patients) were included, with follow-up ranging from 9 months to 7.8 years. LVGLS was the most frequently assessed parameter. Across 21 studies evaluating major adverse cardiovascular events, worse baseline strain values were consistently associated with increased risk (hazard ratios 1.06–2.70 per unit decrease in strain magnitude). Two studies reported significant associations with ventricular arrhythmias, and 4 showed that more favorable baseline strain predicted a higher likelihood of left ventricular reverse remodeling. Strain parameters, particularly LVGLS, remained independently associated with outcomes in 34 of 36 studies after multivariable adjustment, often providing incremental value beyond LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement. These findings support strain imaging, especially LVGLS, as an adjunct to conventional risk stratification in diverse NICM populations. Standardized, multicenter prospective studies are needed to establish its role in clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy (n=7,903). Myocardial strain imaging was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.06-2.70). Worse baseline myocardial strain values were consistently associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.06–2.70 per unit decrease in strain magnitude).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: