Key result
GLS provides ~60% better prognostic performance than LVEF across heart failure phenotypes.
Why the study?
Traditional LVEF-centric approaches detect cardiac dysfunction late and provide limited insights into myocardial mechanics, motivating evaluation of myocardial strain imaging for heart failure assessment.
Does myocardial strain imaging by 2D STE improve diagnostic and prognostic assessment compared to traditional LVEF in patients across the heart failure spectrum?
Does myocardial strain imaging by 2D STE improve diagnostic and prognostic assessment compared to traditional LVEF in patients across the heart failure spectrum?
Strain imaging via 2D STE provides superior sensitivity and prognostic value compared to traditional LVEF for early detection, phenotyping, and risk stratification across the heart failure spectrum.
May support GLS for preclinical HF risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before changing LVEF-centric practice.
Traditional ejection fraction (LVEF)-centric approaches often detect cardiac dysfunction late and offer limited insights into myocardial mechanics. Myocardial strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D STE) has emerged as a high-sensitivity alternative for comprehensive heart failure (HF) evaluation. This synthesis evaluates the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring capabilities of multi-chamber strain imaging across the HF spectrum. Based on current evidence, global longitudinal strain (GLS) provides superior sensitivity over LVEF in detecting subclinical myocardial injury. In preclinical settings (Stage B HF), a GLS <16% serves as an important diagnostic criterion, reclassifying 13% of asymptomatic patients and predicting a four-fold higher risk of HF hospitalization. In cardio-oncology, a 15% relative decline in GLS successfully identifies subclinical toxicity before LVEF drops. Across HF phenotypes, GLS <16% has been incorporated as a minor diagnostic criterion for HFpEF. GLS is a 1.6-fold better prognostic marker than LVEF (particularly in preclinical stages and HFpEF) and exhibits a more linear relationship with mortality. Furthermore, left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (<18%) accurately grades diastolic dysfunction, while right ventricular free-wall longitudinal strain (RV FWLS) acts as a powerful independent predictor of death. In conclusion, strain imaging has expanded from a specialized technique to a part of contemporary HF evaluation. By capturing myocardial mechanics, it enables early detection, precise phenotyping, robust risk stratification, and timely therapy monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosmala et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. Myocardial strain imaging (2D STE / GLS) vs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated. Global longitudinal strain imaging provides superior sensitivity over LVEF for detecting subclinical myocardial injury and is a 1.6-fold better prognostic marker across heart failure phenotypes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: