Key result
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most accurate and sensitive parameter for assessing early left ventricular dysfunction, overcoming the limitations of ejection fraction.
Why the study?
The role of left ventricular ejection fraction as the gold standard for systolic function has been questioned, prompting the validation of new noninvasive tools like two-dimensional strain.
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) improve the detection of early myocardial dysfunction compared to ejection fraction?
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) improve the detection of early myocardial dysfunction compared to ejection fraction?
This review highlights global longitudinal strain as a superior, sensitive tool for early detection of left ventricular dysfunction compared to traditional ejection fraction.
GLS may aid early LV dysfunction detection over EF; leaves open prospective outcome trials before routine adoption.
In recent years, the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) as the gold standard parameter for the evaluation of systolic function has been questioned, and many efforts have been concentrated in the clinical validation of new noninvasive tools for the study of myocardial contractility. Improvement in the accuracy of speckle-tracking echocardiography has resulted in a large amount of research showing the ability of two-dimensional strain to overcome EF limitations in the majority of primary and secondary heart diseases. Currently, global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most accurate and sensitive parameter for the assessment of early left ventricular dysfunction. This review summarizes the advantages that this measurement can provide in several clinical settings. Moreover, the important cautions that should be considered in making the choice to use GLS also are addressed. Finally, a special focus on bull's-eye polar maps for the assessment of regional changes of longitudinal function and the usefulness of these maps in the differential diagnosis of several diseases is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zito et al. (2018) conducted a review in Early left ventricular dysfunction. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) vs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was evaluated. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most accurate and sensitive parameter for assessing early left ventricular dysfunction, overcoming the limitations of ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: