Comparative modeling study demonstrates tree-based algorithms predict thermal conductivity enhancement in phase change materials, highlighting their utility for screening familiar material families.
Organic phase change materials store latent heat efficiently but their low thermal conductivity limits charging and discharging rates. This study evaluates whether a data-driven surrogate can predict conductivity enhancement across a heterogeneous, multi-source experimental database. A curated set of 150 measurements from 21 primary studies was modelled using linear regression, support-vector regression, random forest, gradient boosting and a feed-forward neural network. The target was the dimensionless logarithmic enhancement ratio y = log 10 (k eff /k base ), evaluated with preprocessing-leakage-free ten-fold cross-validation. Gradient boosting and random forest gave the highest mean cross-validation R 2 values, 0.46 ± 0.56 and 0.43 ± 0.70, respectively; the lowest RMSE was 0.17 and the lowest MAE was 0.10. Support-vector regression and the neural network overfitted, with negative cross-validation R 2 despite high training scores. Loading and filler intrinsic conductivity were the dominant descriptors. An operational synergy index applied only to matched mono- and hybrid measurements ranged from 0.65 to 0.75 for sub-additive pairs to 2.0 for a GNP-MWCNT formulation. Leave-one-source-out validation reduced R 2 to approximately 0.05, showing that the model is suitable for screening within represented material families but not for quantitative prediction of unseen source systems without retraining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alqurashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: