Scoping review reveals gendered disparities shaping retirement resources in women, highlighting the need for equitable workplace interventions.
Despite women’s growing participation in the workforce, their retirement experiences remain understudied and are often interpreted through male-centered frameworks. Using the Resource-Based Dynamic model this scoping review synthesizes evidence from 162 peer-reviewed studies on women’s retirement adjustment. The review identifies four key antecedents of resource accumulation and adjustment quality: pre-retirement occupational status, control over retirement decisions and planning, psychological disposition and values, and post-retirement social engagement. Findings indicate that caregiving responsibilities, career interruptions, and gender-based income disparities shape women’s access to critical resources and influence retirement outcomes. The review also reveals key gaps in the literature, including limited longitudinal research, insufficient intersectional analysis, and a lack of geographic diversity. Implications for Human Resource Development include adopting gender-sensitive retirement frameworks and targeted interventions that promote women’s financial, social, and psychological well-being while advancing equity and fostering more inclusive retirement policies and practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazumdar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: