Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates exhaust heat recovery lowers electricity costs by 18.6% in hydrogen generator systems, highlighting waste energy integration as key to clean power.
Hydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engines (H 2 -ICEs) are increasingly considered as transitional low-carbon power technologies, yet their deployment is limited by reduced efficiency and high electricity costs under open-cycle operation. This study presents a unified thermodynamic and techno-economic comparison of gasoline, open-cycle hydrogen, and waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICE generator systems using an ASPEN-based process simulation framework. At the highest stable equivalence ratios examined (φ = 1.045 for gasoline and φ = 0.857 for hydrogen), the open-cycle H 2 -ICE exhibits a 17.5 % lower brake thermal efficiency than gasoline, at 33.4 % versus 40.5 %. To mitigate this penalty, an exhaust-mounted electric turbogenerator (ETG) coupled with a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser is integrated to recover exhaust energy and enable in-situ hydrogen regeneration. When system performance is evaluated based on the combined engine brake and recovered electrical output, the integrated H 2 -ICE with waste heat recovery achieves apparent extended system-level energy utilisation factors of 54.4 % using ASPEN simulations and 52.3 % based on theoretical analysis. Techno-economic analysis under defined operating conditions of 5 h day −1 and 365 days year −1 shows that open-cycle hydrogen increases the levelised cost of electricity by approximately 34 % for grey hydrogen and more than 400 % for green hydrogen relative to gasoline, whereas waste heat recovery reduces the grey hydrogen LCOE to 0.727 MYR kWh −1 . This corresponds to reductions of 39.4 % relative to open-cycle hydrogen and 18.6 % relative to gasoline. Overall, the results demonstrate that the viability of hydrogen ICEs is governed by system-level energy recovery and integration rather than standalone engine efficiency, highlighting the thermodynamic potential of waste-heat-recovery-integrated H 2 -ICEs as a transitional low-carbon stationary power concept under favourable integration and component cost assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: