Why the study?
The transmitral L wave is a known marker of diastolic dysfunction observed in patients with fluid retention, low heart rate, and AF, but how hemodynamic conditions, heart rhythm, and serial heart rate changes affect the L wave was unknown.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case demonstrates that the echocardiographic transmitral L wave is dynamically influenced by heart rate, rhythm (atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm), and volume status, suggesting its potential utility as a marker of treatment efficacy and decongestion in heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support L wave as decongestion marker in paced HF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Mid-diastolic forward flow velocity of transmitral flow (L wave) is known as a marker of diastolic dysfunction and is occasionally observed in patients with fluid retention, low heart rate, and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, how hemodynamic condition affects L wave is still unknown. An 81-year-old woman who underwent implantation of a DDD pacemaker due to complete atrioventricular block 38 years previously suffered from congestive heart failure and was admitted to our hospital. At the time of admission, electrocardiogram showed new-onset AF resulting in mode switch to VVI, and echocardiography showed a giant L wave. At the mid-term of the treatment, AF was converted to sinus rhythm resulting in mode switch to DDD, and pacemaker check-up was performed at pre- and post-cardioversion. During the pacemaker check-ups, L wave was assessed in various pacing rates. As pacing rate was increased, L wave altered according to heart rates and disappeared at 85 bpm in VVI with AF, whereas at 75 bpm in DDD. Through the treatment, L wave got smaller as fluid retention was improved and finally disappeared at the time of discharge. This case suggests that L wave is highly variable and affected by fluid volume, heart rate, and heart rhythm. < Learning objective: Although L wave is known as a marker of diastolic dysfunction and occasionally observed in patients with high left ventricular filling pressure, low heart rate, and atrial fibrillation, how hemodynamics affects L wave is still unknown. In this case, it was observed that L wave is highly variable in the therapeutic process of heart failure and affected by fluid volume, heart rate, and heart rhythm. L wave potentially can be a useful indicator to evaluate treatment efficacy for heart failure.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morisawa et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Decompensated congestive heart failure with persistent atrial fibrillation and DDD pacemaker (n=1). Serial pacemaker rate adjustment (60 to 90 bpm in VVI and DDD modes), cardioversion, and loop diuretic therapy was evaluated on Disappearance of the transmitral L wave (mid-diastolic forward flow velocity <20 cm/sec or absorption into E and A waves).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: