This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
AIM: To evaluate the association between infection with specific strains of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer in patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: One thousand, six hundred and twenty-six consecutive dyspeptic patients, referred to one Endoscopy Unit in Bologna, Italy, were enrolled. For each participant, a blood sample was obtained for the measurement of distinct immunoglobulin G antibodies against H. pylori lysate and cytotoxin associated gene A (cagA). A case-control study included the whole series: patients diagnosed with duodenal (n=275) or gastric (n=71) ulcer were identified and independently compared with controls with non-ulcer dyspepsia (n=1280). RESULTS: H. pylori seroprevalence (at least one positive marker) was associated with increasing age, male sex and a diagnosis of peptic ulcer. This association was stronger with duodenal ulcer (multivariate odds ratio (OR), 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-7.9) than with gastric ulcer (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4). Further analyses showed that H. pylori lysate+/cagA- subjects had a moderately increased risk of duodenal (OR, 3.2), but not gastric (OR, 1.1), ulcer. When cagA+ subjects were separately compared with seronegative patients, there was a six-fold increased risk for duodenal ulcer and a three-fold increased risk for gastric ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: A strong positive association between infection with a cagA+ H. pylori strain and the presence of peptic disease was found. The seroprevalence of anti-cagA antibodies among patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia is so high (41%) to preclude its use as a pre-endoscopic screening test.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palli et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: