Why the study?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography improve the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular volume and mass measurement compared to two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy subjects?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography improve the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular volume and mass measurement compared to two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy subjects?
Three-dimensional echocardiography provides more accurate and reproducible measurements of left ventricular volume and mass than conventional 2D echocardiography, with accuracy comparable to MRI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve left ventricular measurement reproducibility in practice; leaves open prospective validation in patients.
There is a need for more accurate and reproducible serial measurement of left ventricular volume and mass in individual subjects by echocardiography. Conventional echocardiography has significant measurement variability because of its use of geometric assumptions and image plane positioning errors. Guided three-dimensional echocardiography eliminates geometric assumptions and reduces image plane positioning errors by using a "line of intersection" display. Use of three-dimensional guided imaging for a one-dimensional measurement of the left ventricle resulted in a threefold improvement of interobserver variability over conventional echocardiographic measurements. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction of the ventricle for ventricular volume from a series of 8 to 10 short-axis images also achieved more than a threefold improvement of interobserver variability compared with two-dimensional echocardiography. Three-dimensional echocardiographic computation of ventricular volume and mass in healthy subjects was achieved with an accuracy comparable to magnetic resonance imaging and was superior to two-dimensional echocardiography. Three-dimensional echocardiography promises to be a more accurate method of estimating left ventricular volume and mass and may be suitable for serial study of individual subjects because of its improved accuracy and decreased interobserver variability compared with conventional echocardiographic methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: