Key result
A step-wise genetic testing model is recommended for pulmonary hypertension, prioritizing BMPR2 screening followed by targeted testing of ALK1, endoglin, and EIF2AK4 based on clinical phenotype.
Highlights the importance of a step-wise genetic testing approach for patients with pulmonary hypertension, starting with BMPR2.
In this issue of the European Respiratory Journal , Girerd et al. [1] summarise their experience to date with genetic testing for reported mutations in cohorts of patients with familial pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), idiopathic PAH, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) and pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis (PCH). This collective work from the French Referral Centre of Pulmonary Hypertension represents a current state of the art in a fast moving and complex area from a group with considerable experience. In the last decade, we have moved from a simple and unequivocal association of one gene; heterozygous germline mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) [2, 3], to multiple hits in the BMPR2 signalling pathway [4–8], to additional genes in non-canonical BMP pathways of uncertain clinical significance or definitively agreed frequencies [9–11]. How to test, what to test and how to counsel is already a potential minefield. It is only likely to become more complicated in the immediate future given the technological advances and rapidly decreasing costs involved in large-scale genetic studies. So for now, we have a well-delineated step-wise model set out, in which patients are first tested for BMPR2 and, if negative, a sub-selected population proceeded to activin receptor-like kinase (ALK)1 and endoglin testing. EIF2AK4 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 4) was only screened in patients suspected of having PVOD/PCH. This is not dissimilar to the recent change to guidelines where it is now recommend that genetic testing should be offered in PVOD/PCH, familial and sporadic PAH, but largely leave the specifics of this to local guidelines and regulations. If BMPR2 testing is negative, it is suggested that endoglin/ALK1 should be considered for patients aged under 40 years or with a history (or family history) of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) [12]. In a French cohort, those with a familial history were also tested for SMAD9, KCNK3 and CAV-1of PAH if negative for BMPR2/ALK1/endoglin. The largest genetic screen to date shows that some pulmonary hypertension patients should be offered genetic testing
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Toshner (2016) conducted an editorial in Pulmonary hypertension (PAH, PVOD, PCH). Genetic testing was evaluated. A step-wise genetic testing model is recommended for pulmonary hypertension, prioritizing BMPR2 screening followed by targeted testing of ALK1, endoglin, and EIF2AK4 based on clinical phenotype.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: