Why the study?
Does 3D TEE provide more accurate assessment of RVOT morphology and cardiac output compared to 2D TEE?
Does 3D TEE provide more accurate assessment of RVOT morphology and cardiac output compared to 2D TEE?
3D TEE demonstrates that the RVOT is typically oval rather than circular, which allows for more accurate calculation of cardiac output compared to standard 2D TEE.
May enhance cardiac output estimation in non-circular RVOT; leaves open whether 3D TEE should supplant 2D in routine practice.
BACKGROUND: The shape of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has been assumed to be circular. The aim of this study was to assess RVOT morphology using 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study included 114 patients who underwent 3D TEE. Two-dimensional (2D) TEE measured maximum and minimum RVOT diameters (RVOTD max and min) during a cardiac cycle. 3D TEE determined RVOT area (RVOTA) max and min, RVOT fractional area change, and RVOT shape index (RVOTSI; vertical/horizontal RVOTD). Cardiac output (CO) was calculated using 2D TEE, 3D TEE, and a Swan-Ganz catheter in 23 patients. All patients were classified into group 1 (RVOTSI ≤1) or group 2 (RVOTSI >1) based on the RVOT shapes. The mean RVOTSIs were 0.84±0.21(max) and 0.82±0.20 (min). Only 17 patients (14.9%) had circular RVOT (RVOTSI: 0.95-1.05); 82 patients (71.9%) were categorized into group 1 and 32 patients (28.1%) into group 2. 2D TEE, compared with 3D TEE, underestimated RVOTA max and min (both P<0.001). CO with 3D TEE had better agreement with CO with a catheter than CO with 2D TEE (r=0.83 and 0.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: 3D TEE revealed that RVOT geometry was not generally circular but oval with 2 different types. Because of the detailed morphological information of RVOT, 3D TEE could provide more accurate assessment of CO than 2D TEE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izumo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: