Key result
Acutely symptomatic carotid plaques exhibited significantly higher critical biomechanical stress at the site of maximum plaque burden compared to asymptomatic plaques (median 198.0 kPa vs 138.4 kPa, P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does MRI-based biomechanical stress analysis differentiate acutely symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid plaques?
Cross-Sectional (n=99)
No
Does MRI-based biomechanical stress analysis differentiate acutely symptomatic from asymptomatic carotid plaques?
Absolute Event Rate: 198% vs 138.4%
p-value: p=0.04
MRI-based finite element analysis demonstrates that acutely symptomatic carotid plaques have significantly higher biomechanical stresses at the site of maximum plaque burden compared to asymptomatic plaques, suggesting a potential tool for vulnerability assessment.
May support MRI stress analysis for carotid plaque vulnerability assessment; leaves open its incremental clinical value pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stresses play an important role in determining plaque stability. Quantification of these simulated stresses can be potentially used to assess plaque vulnerability and differentiate different patient groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: 54 asymptomatic and 45 acutely symptomatic patients underwent in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid arteries. Plaque geometry used for nite element analysis was derived from in vivo MRI at the sites of maximum and minimum plaque burden. In total, 198 slices were used for the computational simulations. A pre-shrink technique was used to refine the simulation. Maximum principle stress at the vulnerable plaque sites (ie, critical stress) was extracted for the selected slices and a comparison was performed between the 2 groups. Critical stress in the slice with maximum plaque burden is significantly higher in acutely symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients (median, inter quartile range: 198.0 kPa (119.8-359.0 kPa) vs 138.4 kPa (83.8-242.6 kPa), P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the slice with minimum plaque burden between the 2 groups (196.7 kPa (133.3-282.7 kPa) vs 182.4 kPa (117.2-310.6 kPa), P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Acutely symptomatic carotid plaques have significantly high biomechanical stresses than asymptomatic plaques. This might be potentially useful for establishing a biomechanical risk stratification criteria based on plaque burden in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid artery disease (n=99). Acutely symptomatic carotid artery disease vs. Asymptomatic carotid artery disease was evaluated on Critical stress (maximum principle stress) in the slice with maximum plaque burden (p=0.04). Acutely symptomatic carotid plaques exhibited significantly higher critical biomechanical stress at the site of maximum plaque burden compared to asymptomatic plaques (median 198.0 kPa vs 138.4 kPa, P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: