Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: