Key result
PBPK and static model predictions of AUC ratios were within 2-fold of observed values for most of the 7 drugs across renal impairment categories, though accuracy was lower for severe impairment.
Why the study?
Can physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) and static models accurately predict drug clearance in renal impairment populations?
Can physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) and static models accurately predict drug clearance in renal impairment populations?
PBPK and static models can provide reasonable prospective predictions of pharmacokinetics in mild to moderate renal impairment for early decision-making, but are insufficient as sole justification for dose recommendations.
PBPK and static models may aid early PK predictions in mild-moderate renal impairment; leaves open sole use for dosing in severe cases.
Dose recommendations for specific populations are not always provided and, when available, typically rely on empirical derivation from a small fraction of the general population. In this study, a prediction/confirmation framework was applied to 2 model-based methods, physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) and a static model, to evaluate their ability to predict clearance in mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment populations and to inform dosing recommendations in these populations. Simulated renal impairment/healthy subject AUC ratios (AUCRs) from PBPK and static models were compared with observed AUCRs from dedicated clinical studies in renal impairment subjects for 7 drugs eliminated primarily by renal clearance. Both PBPK and static model predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCRs for most compounds across all renal impairment categories. Predictions were generally more accurate for the mild and moderate renal impairment populations, with the majority of AUCR predictions within 80% to 125% of observed values for both methods. However, the accuracy of predictions was lower for the severe renal impairment population using the PBPK method. Given the accuracy observed, both methods may be suitable for prospective predictions for early decision-making, but are likely not sufficient sole justification for dose recommendations. There is a need to assess a larger database of compounds to enhance the predictive power of currently available tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yee et al. (2017) studied Renal impairment. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) and static models vs. Observed AUCRs from dedicated clinical studies was evaluated on Accuracy of simulated renal impairment/healthy subject AUC ratios (AUCRs) compared with observed AUCRs. PBPK and static model predictions of AUC ratios were within 2-fold of observed values for most of the 7 drugs across renal impairment categories, though accuracy was lower for severe impairment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: