Key result
Female sex predicted significantly greater improvements in social, emotional, and physical health-related quality of life during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation compared to male sex (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation improves cardiovascular outcomes and health-related quality of life but remains underutilized, particularly among women and older patients, warranting examination of age- and sex-specific effects.
Do sex and age predict changes in health-related quality of life during Phase II cardiac rehabilitation?
Observational (n=8,286)
Yes
Do sex and age predict changes in health-related quality of life during Phase II cardiac rehabilitation?
Women report poorer baseline health-related quality of life at cardiac rehabilitation entry but experience significantly greater improvements than men across social, emotional, and physical domains.
Women may particularly benefit from inpatient CR for HRQOL gains; supports sex-specific tailoring but leaves practice change open pending prospective trials.
AIMS: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) not only improves cardiovascular outcomes, but also health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Unfortunately, CR is still underutilized, especially among women and older patients. Aim of this study was to highlight age- and sex-specific effects of inpatient CR on HRQOL. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018, 18 459 patients were prospectively assessed in six Swiss CR clinics. Of these, we retrospectively analysed a final sample of 8286 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 67.8 (11.3) in men and 72.2 (11.3) in women. HRQOL was measured at CR entry and discharge. In multivariable analyses, sex- and age-specific changes in HRQOL throughout CR were estimated, adjusting for baseline HRQOL and clinical characteristics. Participants of both sexes improved significantly (P < 0.001) in all domains of HRQOL during CR. Women reported significantly lower social (P < 0.001) and emotional (P < 0.001) HRQOL than men at CR entry. Female sex predicted greater improvement in social (F = 19.63, P < 0.001), emotional (F = 27.814, P < 0.001), and physical HRQOL (F = 20.473, P < 0.001). In a subgroup of n = 2632 elderly patients (>75 years), female sex predicted greater changes in emotional (F = 15.738, P < 0.001) and physical (F = 6.295, P = 0.012), but not in social HRQOL. CONCLUSION: Women report poorer HRQOL at CR entry compared with men, but in turn particularly benefit from CR in this regard. Our results indicate that sex- and age-specific needs of patients should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jellestad et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (n=8,286). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Changes in social, emotional, and physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (p=<0.001). Female sex predicted significantly greater improvements in social, emotional, and physical health-related quality of life during inpatient cardiac rehabilitation compared to male sex (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: