Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation is linked to improved HRQoL, with greater gains in women and ethnic minorities.
Why the study?
Variability in the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation across sociodemographic groups remains incompletely understood.
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve health-related quality of life differently across sociodemographic groups in patients following cardiovascular events?
Cohort (n=464)
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve health-related quality of life differently across sociodemographic groups in patients following cardiovascular events?
p-value: p=<.001
Women and ethnic-minority patients derive substantial HRQoL benefits from cardiac rehabilitation despite lower baseline status, highlighting the need for targeted strategies to improve their participation.
May warrant equity-focused retention in cardiac rehab; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a cornerstone of secondary prevention following cardiovascular events; however, variability in its benefits across sociodemographic groups remains incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following CR across sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: In this prospective study, 464 consecutive patients participating in a CR program were assessed. Using the Short-Form Survey-12 questionnaire, HRQoL was evaluated at baseline and upon program completion. Functional capacity (six-minute walk test and exercise cardiac stress test), clinical characteristics, and adherence rates were analyzed across subgroups defined by gender, ethnicity, and timing of CR initiation. RESULTS: Significant improvements in both physical and mental HRQoL outcomes were associated with participation in CR (P < .001). Women and ethnic-minority patients presented with lower baseline HRQoL; however, they demonstrated greater relative improvements in physical and mental domains, respectively (P < .05 and P < .001). Despite these benefits, ethnic-minority patients exhibited lower adherence rates (P < .01). Early initiation of CR (≤90 days) was associated with superior baseline functional capacity, as reflected by greater six-minute walk test distances and higher metabolic equivalents. CONCLUSIONS: Women and ethnic-minority patients derive substantial HRQoL benefits from CR despite lower baseline status, yet remain less engaged in rehabilitation programs. These findings highlight a critical gap in secondary prevention and underscore the need for targeted, equity-oriented strategies to improve participation and maximize outcomes in high-benefit populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shlomo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular events (n=464). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. Baseline was evaluated on Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p=<.001). Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved physical and mental health-related quality of life (P<.001), with women and ethnic-minority patients demonstrating greater relative improvements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: