Key result
Combined pre- and postoperative rehabilitation cuts postoperative pulmonary complications ~61% versus postoperative rehab alone.
Why the study?
While postoperative rehabilitation is standard of care in cardiac surgery, the incremental benefit of adding a preoperative rehabilitation phase remains uncertain.
Does combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation improve postoperative pulmonary complications, functional capacity, pulmonary function, and length of hospital stay in adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery?
Systematic Review (n=3,200)
Does combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation improve postoperative pulmonary complications, functional capacity, pulmonary function, and length of hospital stay in adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery?
Adding a structured prehabilitation phase to standard postoperative rehabilitation significantly reduces postoperative pulmonary complications, improves functional capacity, and enhances pulmonary function after cardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding prehabilitation to postoperative rehab to reduce complications and boost function; extends RCT evidence but needs standardized trials.
Prehabilitation, delivered before surgery in addition to standard postoperative rehabilitation, has been proposed as a strategy to improve outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. While postoperative rehabilitation is standard of care, the incremental benefit of adding a preoperative phase remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation (Pre+Post) with postoperative rehabilitation alone (Post-only) in adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and MEDLINE were performed up to March 2025. Primary outcomes were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), functional capacity, pulmonary function, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, quality of life (QoL), and psychological measures. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 11 RCTs and six non-randomized studies, with over 3,200 participants. Meta-analysis of six RCTs (n = 1,729) showed that Pre+Post rehabilitation significantly reduced PPCs (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.80, p = 0.01), corresponding to a 61% lower risk. Four RCTs (n = 315) demonstrated superior postoperative functional capacity in the Pre+Post group, with a pooled mean difference of +42 m in 6MWT (95% CI 32.39-51.68, p < 0.00001, I² = 0%). Pulmonary function was improved, with increases in FVC (+0.45 L, 95% CI 0.20-0.70) and FEV₁ (+0.36 L, 95% CI 0.14-0.58). Hospital LOS was reduced by almost three days (MD -2.92, 95% CI -4.52 to -1.31), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 87%). Effects on ICU stay and QoL were mixed. Adding a structured prehabilitation phase to standard postoperative rehabilitation significantly reduces PPCs, improves functional capacity, and enhances pulmonary function after cardiac surgery. While benefits on LOS and QoL are less consistent, the overall evidence supports the integration of prehabilitation into perioperative care pathways. Future large-scale RCTs with standardized protocols are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbadrawy et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Elective cardiac surgery (n=3,200). Combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation vs. Postoperative rehabilitation alone was evaluated on Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.80, p=0.01). Combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications by 61% (RR 0.39) compared to postoperative rehabilitation alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: