Key result
Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation is recommended by the AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 Performance Measures for every eligible patient to improve guideline implementation.
Implementing automatic referral systems for cardiac rehabilitation can help overcome erratic implementation and align practice with AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures.
May support automatic referral to boost cardiac rehabilitation uptake; leaves open contemporary trials on implementation effectiveness.
The pervasive negative impact of cardiovascular disease in the United States is well documented. Although advances have been made, the campaign to reduce the occurrence, progression, and mortality continues. Determining evidence-based data is only half the battle. Implementing new and updated clinical guidelines into daily practice is a challenging task. Cardiac rehabilitation is an example of a proven intervention whose benefit is hindered through erratic implementation. The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the American Heart Association (AHA) have responded to this problem by publishing the AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to and Delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services. This new national guideline recommends automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation for every eligible patient (performance measure A-1). This article offers guidance for the initiation of an automatic referral system, including individualizing your protocol with regard to electronic or paper-based order entry structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jane P. Fischer (2008) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated. Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation is recommended by the AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 Performance Measures for every eligible patient to improve guideline implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: